TREATY: Wrongful interference in an arbitration can itself be expropriation

The Saipem decision shows treaty arbitration’s scope for providing relief at the hands of domestic courts, where investors have suffered injustice but at the same time might not make a good precedent. By Matthew Weiniger (partner) and Promod Nair (associate) of Herbert Smith in London

Purchase an approved for publication custom PDF below.

An official PDF provides excellent marketing opportunities, enabling you to post the article online, make reprints and distribute under the GAR brand.

Back to top

Payments powered by RBS WorldPay

Law Business Research Ltd

87 Lancaster Road, London
W11 1QQ, UK
Queen's Award logo International Bar Association logo American Bar Association strategic partner logo

Copyright © 2012 Law Business Research Ltd. All rights reserved. | http://www.lbresearch.com

87 Lancaster Road, London, W11 1QQ, UK | Tel: +44 207 908 1188 / Fax: +44 207 229 6910

http://www.globalarbitrationreview.com | editorial@globalarbitrationreview.com