Hotel dispute leads to ruling on pleading omissions

Alison Ross Monday, 16 July 2012 (10 months ago)

The Singapore Court of Appeal has reversed a decision that an arbitrator can only consider new facts or issues where a party has applied for and been granted permission to amend its pleadings, in a dispute between Indonesian group Prima and Swiss chain Kempinski over the management of a hotel in Jakarta.

The Intercontinetal Jakarta Midplaza Hotel, formerly the Kempinski Plaza Jakarta

The Intercontinetal Jakarta Midplaza Hotel, formerly the Kempinski Plaza Jakarta (Credit: Intercontinental)

Subscription required to view this article

This content can only be accessed by subscribers.

Please note: If you would like online access to all archived content, you will need a subscription with Premium access.

Please see Subscriptions.

If you are a subscriber, please login:

Comments

You must Subscribe or Log In to make comments.

Comment Terms & Conditions

Back to top

Law Business Research Ltd

87 Lancaster Road, London
W11 1QQ, UK
Queen's Award logo International Bar Association logo American Bar Association strategic partner logo

Copyright © 2013 Law Business Research Ltd. All rights reserved. | http://www.lbresearch.com

87 Lancaster Road, London, W11 1QQ, UK | Tel: +44 207 908 1188 / Fax: +44 207 229 6910

http://www.globalarbitrationreview.com | editorial@globalarbitrationreview.com