LONDON: The problems of med-arb – should Keeneye open our eyes?
Clemmie Spalton
Thursday, 22 September 2011
Featured In: Volume 6 - Issue 5 (Vol. 6 Iss. 5)
Jeffrey Elkinson, deputy president of the Chartered Institute of Arbitrators and director and partner at Conyers Dill and Pearman in Bermuda, says the decision of the Hong Kong High Court in Gao Haiyan and Xie Heping v Keeneye Holdings may be a "wake-up call" for those in favour of the med-arb process.
Subscription required to view this article
This content can only be accessed by GAR subscribers.
A subscription includes 6 issues of the journal, The GAR100 and the International Who's Who of Commercial Arbitration and full access to all current print & online content.
Please note: If you would like online access to all archived content, you will need a subscription with archive access.
If you are a GAR subscriber, please login to access this content:
Comments
You must Subscribe or Log In to make comments.
Comment Terms & Conditions
Back to Volume 6 - Issue 5 (Vol. 6 Iss. 5)
Back to top