The UK and French courts have reached different conclusions in Dallah v Pakistan.

The UK and French courts have reached different conclusions in Dallah v Pakistan.

Dallah v Pakistan: vive la différence?

Wednesday, 20 April 2011

Patrick Heneghan and Jonathon Egerton-Peters, both of Skadden Arps Slate Meagher & Flom, ask whether the different conclusions of the UK Supreme Court and the Paris Court of Appeal in Dallah v Pakistan represent a UK-French stand-off or simply a difference of opinion?

Archive Subscription required to view this article

This content can only be accessed by GCR subscribers with archive access.

A subscription with archive access includes 6 issues of the journal, The GAR100 and the International Who's Who of Commercial Arbitration and full access to all current print & online content.

If you are a GAR subscriber, please login to access this content:

Law Business Research Ltd

87 Lancaster Road, London
W11 1QQ, UK
Queen's Award logo International Bar Association logo American Bar Association strategic partner logo

Copyright © 2012 Law Business Research Ltd. All rights reserved. | http://www.lbresearch.com

87 Lancaster Road, London, W11 1QQ, UK | Tel: +44 207 908 1188 / Fax: +44 207 229 6910

http://www.globalarbitrationreview.com | editorial@globalarbitrationreview.com