Award vacated over arbitrators' non-disclosure
Uzma Balkiss Sulaiman
Wednesday, 03 March 2010
Two arbitrators have seen their award vacated by a New York court after failing to mention that they had been appointed to hear a similar case featuring a closely connected party and a common witness.
Archive Subscription required to view this article
This content can only be accessed by GCR subscribers with archive access.
A subscription with archive access includes 6 issues of the journal, The GAR100 and the International Who's Who of Commercial Arbitration and full access to all current print & online content.
If you are a GAR subscriber, please login to access this content:
Comments
You must Subscribe or Log In to make comments.
Comment Terms & Conditions
Back to top