MONEY COLUMN: Upholding a “baldly stated” sum
Wednesday, 01 September 2010
Featured In: Volume 5 - Issue 4 (Vol. 5 Iss. 4)
The February 2010 decision of the ICSID annulment committee in the dispute between investors Rumeli Telekom and Telsim Mobil and Kazakhstan highlights how tribunals may resolve the fundamental problem in expropriation cases of the “inherently uncertain” quantification of a business’s market value. Mark Kantor, a Washington, DC attorney and member of the Global Arbitration Review editorial board, says that, for the annulment committee, the process of calculating the amount to be awarded is one of “informed estimation” by the tribunal
Archive Subscription required to view this article
This content can only be accessed by GCR subscribers with archive access.
A subscription with archive access includes 6 issues of the journal, The GAR100 and the International Who's Who of Commercial Arbitration and full access to all current print & online content.
If you are a GAR subscriber, please login to access this content:



Comments
You must Subscribe or Log In to make comments.
Comment Terms & Conditions
Back to Volume 5 - Issue 4 (Vol. 5 Iss. 4)
Back to top