US: Supreme Court Restricts Arbitrators' Power to Order Class Arbitration
Tuesday, 22 June 2010
Featured In: Volume 5 - Issue 3 (Vol. 5 Iss. 3)
On 27 April 2010, in a 5–3 decision, the US Supreme Court ruled in Stolt-Nielsen SA v AnimalFeeds International Corp No. 08–1198 (2010) that an arbitration tribunal that compels class arbitration, without concluding that the parties contractually agreed to it (either expressly or as construed under the applicable law), exceeded its powers under the Federal Arbitration Act. Mark Beckett, David McLean, Rachel Thorn, Marc Suskin and Timothy Ho of Latham & Watkins report on a case which will diminish the use of class arbitration in the US, although it will continue to be available at least in some circumstances
Archive Subscription required to view this article
This content can only be accessed by GCR subscribers with archive access.
A subscription with archive access includes 6 issues of the journal, The GAR100 and the International Who's Who of Commercial Arbitration and full access to all current print & online content.
If you are a GAR subscriber, please login to access this content:



Comments
You must Subscribe or Log In to make comments.
Comment Terms & Conditions
Back to Volume 5 - Issue 3 (Vol. 5 Iss. 3)
Back to top