INVESTMENT TREATY ARBITRATION: Undue delay in domestic courts found to violate BIT
Tuesday, 22 June 2010
Featured In: Volume 5 - Issue 3 (Vol. 5 Iss. 3)
In a partial award on the merits in Chevron-Texaco v Ecuador, the tribunal held that a bilateral investment treaty provision requiring Ecuador to provide effective means for investors to assert and enforce their rights constituted a lex specialis distinct from customary international law in relation to denial of justice. The standard, which is found in the Energy Charter Treaty as well as a number of BITs, was held to have been violated as a result of the Ecuadorean courts’ undue delay in bringing seven cases from the 1990s to a close. Matthew Weiniger and Ruth Byrne of Herbert Smith LLP report.
Archive Subscription required to view this article
This content can only be accessed by GCR subscribers with archive access.
A subscription with archive access includes 6 issues of the journal, The GAR100 and the International Who's Who of Commercial Arbitration and full access to all current print & online content.
If you are a GAR subscriber, please login to access this content:



Comments
You must Subscribe or Log In to make comments.
Comment Terms & Conditions
Back to Volume 5 - Issue 3 (Vol. 5 Iss. 3)
Back to top