HOUSTON: Arbitration and National Courts - Conflict and Cooperation
Tuesday, 22 June 2010
Featured In: Volume 5 - Issue 3 (Vol. 5 Iss. 3)
“Judgments are ‘exercises in persuasion’ subject to a potentially polemical style, whereas arbitration awards tend to be written as direct answers to questions posed by the parties.” Lord Leonard Hoffman made this observation in a speech at a symposium on 13 and 14 May examining the way courts can help or hinder arbitration – through injunctions, discovery and the so-called “second look” doctrine. Teresa Cigarroa Keck at Vinson & Elkins LLP in Houston reports
Archive Subscription required to view this article
This content can only be accessed by GCR subscribers with archive access.
A subscription with archive access includes 6 issues of the journal, The GAR100 and the International Who's Who of Commercial Arbitration and full access to all current print & online content.
If you are a GAR subscriber, please login to access this content:



Comments
You must Subscribe or Log In to make comments.
Comment Terms & Conditions
Back to Volume 5 - Issue 3 (Vol. 5 Iss. 3)
Back to top