TREATY: Wrongful interference in an arbitration can itself be expropriation
Thursday, 17 December 2009
Featured In: Volume 4 - Issue 6 (Vol. 4 Iss. 6)
The Saipem decision shows treaty arbitration’s scope for providing relief at the hands of domestic courts, where investors have suffered injustice but at the same time might not make a good precedent. By Matthew Weiniger (partner) and Promod Nair (associate) of Herbert Smith in London
Archive Subscription required to view this article
This content can only be accessed by GCR subscribers with archive access.
A subscription with archive access includes 6 issues of the journal, The GAR100 and the International Who's Who of Commercial Arbitration and full access to all current print & online content.
If you are a GAR subscriber, please login to access this content:
Comments
You must Subscribe or Log In to make comments.
Comment Terms & Conditions
Back to Volume 4 - Issue 6 (Vol. 4 Iss. 6)
Back to top