ENFORCEMENT OF ARBITRATION CLAUSES - Australian court opts for archaic, rather than Arkansas
Sunday, 01 June 2008
Featured In: Volume 3 - Issue 3 (Vol. 3 Iss. 3)
Old statutes can pose a problem when seeking to enforce international arbitration clauses.
Or... not, depending on the judge. Two recent cases show an intriguing difference in approach. By Tim Griffiths, partner of HWL Ebsworth, Sydney
Or... not, depending on the judge. Two recent cases show an intriguing difference in approach. By Tim Griffiths, partner of HWL Ebsworth, Sydney
Archive Subscription required to view this article
This content can only be accessed by GCR subscribers with archive access.
A subscription with archive access includes 6 issues of the journal, The GAR100 and the International Who's Who of Commercial Arbitration and full access to all current print & online content.
If you are a GAR subscriber, please login to access this content:
Comments
You must Subscribe or Log In to make comments.
Comment Terms & Conditions
Back to Volume 3 - Issue 3 (Vol. 3 Iss. 3)
Back to top