A short explanatory defence of the Heidelberg Report
Friday, 01 May 2009
Featured In: Volume 4 - Issue 2 (Vol. 4 Iss. 2)
Any day now, the European Commission will release its response to the Heidelberg Report. That report suggested removing the arbitration exemption from the Brussels Regulation and replacing it with a new interface between courts and international arbitration. The report has drawn a strong reaction in some quarters. Here, Peter Schlosser, professor emeritus at the University of Munich, who helped write the report, defends it. He argues that "selective and prudent" coordination of arbitration laws within the EU would have less impact than many assume
Archive Subscription required to view this article
This content can only be accessed by GCR subscribers with archive access.
A subscription with archive access includes 6 issues of the journal, The GAR100 and the International Who's Who of Commercial Arbitration and full access to all current print & online content.
If you are a GAR subscriber, please login to access this content:
Comments
You must Subscribe or Log In to make comments.
Comment Terms & Conditions
Back to Volume 4 - Issue 2 (Vol. 4 Iss. 2)
Back to top