A short explanatory defence of the Heidelberg Report

Friday, 01 May 2009

Any day now, the European Commission will release its response to the Heidelberg Report. That report suggested removing the arbitration exemption from the Brussels Regulation and replacing it with a new interface between courts and international arbitration. The report has drawn a strong reaction in some quarters. Here, Peter Schlosser, professor emeritus at the University of Munich, who helped write the report, defends it. He argues that "selective and prudent" coordination of arbitration laws within the EU would have less impact than many assume

Archive Subscription required to view this article

This content can only be accessed by GCR subscribers with archive access.

A subscription with archive access includes 6 issues of the journal, The GAR100 and the International Who's Who of Commercial Arbitration and full access to all current print & online content.

If you are a GAR subscriber, please login to access this content:

Law Business Research Ltd

87 Lancaster Road, London
W11 1QQ, UK
Queen's Award logo International Bar Association logo American Bar Association strategic partner logo

Copyright © 2012 Law Business Research Ltd. All rights reserved. | http://www.lbresearch.com

87 Lancaster Road, London, W11 1QQ, UK | Tel: +44 207 908 1188 / Fax: +44 207 229 6910

http://www.globalarbitrationreview.com | editorial@globalarbitrationreview.com